My Blog List

Thursday, November 4, 2010

FALSE FLAG NUKE ATTACK ON U.S. JUSTIFIED….”KING’S TORAH”

GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING


ISRAEL TO USE IRANIAN AND PAKISTANI DUPES IN DIRTY NUKE PLOY


This week, the last piece fell into place. The National Research Council, part of the National Academy of Science, heavy on politics and light on science, announced that America was no longer able to track nukes threatening our shores. Their report titled Nuclear Forensics: A Capability at Risk, released last week, outlines the details of a secret study requested by the Departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Energy, specifically the National Nuclear Security Administration. The gist of the story is easy, if a nuke goes off in America, dirty nuke in Times Square, one in a container at a port, anywhere, America won’t be able to tell who made it. Not a word of the report is true. It is wild speculation and disinformation written in broad language with no hard science, written for a reason.
A powerful group within the United States, one with influence over the press and the ability to derail an investigation as was done with 9/11, has been “tasked” with laying the groundwork for a terrorist attack on America, one using nuclear material. This report, unneeded, and highly inaccurate was printed in the New York Times to provide “cover.” It isn’t just this report, the pieces are falling together around the world. The Wiki-Leaks story, pre staging Pakistan’s ISI as a terrorist organization, a story built out of almost no information but fleshed out with massive speculation by “operatives” in the press is part of the process.
The Defense Authorization Act of 2006 allows, “in case of a terrorist attack” for the president to declare marshal law, disband congress and rule by executive decree. With the suspension of habeas corpus by the Military Commissions act, also in 2006, America as we know it officially comes to an end the second a weapon of mass destruction in used. Only then will America learn who has been pulling the strings all along, who is scripting Wolf Blitzer and Glen Beck.
British Prime Minister David Cameron’s attacks on Pakistan, made from New Delhi last week, seen by most as a serious political blunder, are part of the narrative. We will get to more background on a younger David Cameron later.
Another piece of the puzzle involved a federal task force, Defense, Energy, FBI, descending on a warehouse in Greenfield, Indiana under the guise of a “records search.” This “Waco style” assault on a facility storing furniture for college dorm rooms was much more than it seemed. No case, criminal or civil, provided any underlying reason for the search.
Further, the bizarre tale of rumored missing nukes, illegally transported on a B-52 from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana, a major Defense Department scandal, is meant to create, not only fear and doubt, but “plausible deniability” if a weapon is exploded inside the US. These, however, are not, by far, the only missing nuclear weapons America has to fear as we will get into later.
Two recent attacks, the “Times Square Fizzler” and the Detroit “Crotch Bomber” were both amateurish affairs except for a couple of things. Both perpetrators had strong ties to Israeli organizations, one actually employed by an Israeli-American financial firm, the other the son of Israel’s primary partner in their defense industry complex in Nigeria. None of this was reported or investigated once discovered. It was shoved under the rug immediately. When cursory investigations of both suspects showed travel histories only possible with significant help from an intelligence agency, both stories disappeared from the news entirely. It is as though everyone involved vanished from the face of the earth like the second person arrested in Detroit or the “well dressed Indian” who aided the “Crotch Bomber” onto the plane in Amsterdam.
LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR ATTACKS ON GENTILES
Conservative interpretations of Jewish law, currently being used to justify resettlement of Palestinians and even total removal of all non-Jews from greater Palestine and adjacent areas have long been used to justify acts such as the attack on the USS Liberty, bombings of US facilities in Egypt and, less openly, “false flag” terror attacks attributed to Muslims but performed by Israeli security forces. Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira and Rabbi Yosef Elitzur, seen as the ethical conscience behind the Netanyahu government have taken the following position as reported by Jonathan Cook:
THE KING’S TORAH, ISRAELI”BEST SELLER” JUSTIFIES TERROR
“In the 230-page book, Shapira and his co-author, Rabbi Yosef Elitzur (The King’s Torah, currently Israel’s best selling book) argue that Jewish law permits the killing of non-Jews in a wide variety of circumstances. They write that Jews have the right to kill Gentiles in any situation in which “a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives” even if the Gentile is “not at all guilty for the situation that has been created”.
The book sanctions the killing of non-Jewish children and babies: “There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”
The rabbis suggest that harming the children of non-Jewish leaders is justified if it is likely to bring pressure to bear on them to change policy. The authors also advocate committing “cruel deeds to create the proper balance of terror” and treating all members of an “enemy nation” as targets for retaliation, even if they are not directly participating in hostile activities.” (false flag terror)
This rationale allows deadly force to be used against Christians if their deaths advance the cause of Israeli security even if only through economic profit. Thus, if an attack such as 9/11 were to lead to America fighting wars against enemies of Israel or if, as in Afghanistan, Israeli companies were to profit from weapons or narcotics sales, any deaths of gentiles, no matter how innocent, would be justified by Jewish law as stated in the Torah.
Were an attack on the United States to bring that country to war against Iran, even if that attack were perpetrated by Israelis, it would be legal according to Israeli law, the same law being relied upon for justice in the attack on the Mavi Marmara.
More often however, attacks on Israel itself are believed to have been staged, not only to instill the population with fear and rage but to continue the “holocaust” tradition of Jewish victimhood as a justification for policies that have led to 62 vetoes in the United Nations by the US, vetoes against sanctions imposed against Israel for violations of international law.
We expect increased attacks on Israel, quickly tied to Hezbollah and Iran, attacks that will either involve no casualties or the deaths of either foreign workers or Russian emigres. This pattern has been used repeatedly, such as the March 18 “attack” killing a lone Thai ”guest” worker time to coincide with the visit of the European Union’s high commissioner for security, Catherine Ashton, a critic of Israel’s apartheid policy in Gaza.
On a side note, 400 children of “guest workers” are being expelled from Israel this week. Eventually all will be expelled, guilty of destroying “the Jewish character” through lack of “racial purity.”
When the US and Israel released Sharam Amiri, alleged Iranian nuclear scientist, we learned one thing. There is an inventory of Muslims, perhaps arrested, perhaps kidnapped, maybe lured into custody, rendition, imprisonment or “cold storage,” whatever you want to call it. Each one has an elaborate “legend” built around them, describing them as a “lone gunman” or “terrorist mastermind.” This is the group that will supply the names and photographs we will see after the next terror attack.
As Wayne Madsen described to us this week, this was the process the CIA and Mossad used to createOsama bin Laden from nothing. The organization we know of as Al Qaeda is, in itself, a false creation, an invention initially to serve as terrorist when we needed them and as enemies when we needed them too:
“Press clips gathered by the CIA and discovered in the National Archives’ stored CIA files point to an agency keenly interested in any leaks about the highly-classified CIA-Mossad program to establish Osama Bin Laden and the most radical elements of the Afghan Mujahidin as the primary leaders of the anti-Soviet rebels in the 1980s.
WMR [Wayne Madsen Report] has pored through the CIA files and a complicated picture emerges of America’s and Israel’s top intelligence agencies, in cahoots with Saudi Arabia, establishing financial links and carve out intelligence programs to provide manpower and financial support to Bin Laden and his allies in Afghanistan. It was these very elements that later created the so-called “Al Qaeda,” which the late British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook described as nothing more than a “database” of CIA front organizations, financial supporters, and field operatives. However, one component omitted by Cook in the Al Qaeda construct is the Israeli participation.”
A pattern of evidence is emerging that “cold storage” dupes and CIA/Mossad nurtured organizations may have had a hand in, not only the Mumbai attacks but the London and Madrid bombings as well. Additional trails are leading to attacks on American troops inside Iraq and Afghanistan and against security forces inside Pakistan, particularly against Pakistan’s ISI, primary target of press stories on the recent Wiki-Leak.
AMERICA AND THE “TORY NUKES”
VELA satellites: Detect signatures of nuclear explosions
There are two reasons to attack America’s “forensic capabilities” when it comes to nuclear weapons. A leak the press chose not to cover, one bringing Israel under scrutiny for egregious violations of international treaties on Nuclear Proliferation, treaties Israel has never signed, were brought to the surface recently. Back on September 22 1979, Israel and South Africa tested a nuclear device, an 18.2 kiloton bomb. This test in a remote area of the Indian Ocean was detected by America’s VELA satellite system and confirmed by acoustic sensors. A forensic signature of this weapon was developed, not only through optics but through particle emissions. When an identical weapon was detonated by North Korea on May 25, 2009, a question was raised. How did a nuclear weapon built by Armscor, an Israel company operating in South Africa, end up in North Korea?
This is the story of the “Tory nukes,” nuclear weapons purchased by Margaret Thatcher in 1991 from South Africa under a secret authorization describing the weapons as “cylinders.” Those involved in putting this bombs into special containers, transporting them to Durban and then off to a container storage facility in Oman from which they disappeared are now filling volumes. When the weapons containers which had laid unguarded for months in a container yard in Oman were forwarded to the United States for dis-assembly in accordance with treaty requirements, only concrete blocks were found. The disappearance has been directly tied to two arms traders who ran illegal trafficking for Israel and South Africa during the Iran-Iraq War.
The accused were business partners in the “Ollie North era” Reagan hijinks known as Iran Contra. The “thieves” were connected to the highest levels of, not only Israeli intelligence but the CIA as well.
Israel says Saddam stole the weapons.
As late as 2003, Tony Blair used this “tale” to back what Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg calls “the illegal invasion of Iraq.” Blair had financial incentives to back the invasion, several million of them, as secret letters leaked to the press but never printed have shown.
PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON, DR. DAVID KELLY AND ARMSCORE
Back in 1990, a very young David Cameron, later to become Prime Minister David Cameron, was offered a free trip to South Africa, paid for by Israeli owned Armscor, a nuclear weapons manufacturer. Cameron was supposedly working with Dr. David Kelly investigating weapons of mass destruction in South Africa. In fact something much different was going on. On January 16, 2005, Tim Shipman, Defense Editor of the Sunday Express released the following story, one never reported in US papers. Today, Dr. David Kelly is dead, clearly murdered because of what he knew and David Cameron is in India carefully reading from a script written in Tel Aviv. This is the 2005 story from the Express:
DR. DAVID KELLY, “SUICIDED” MISSING NUKE WHISTLEBLOWER
Dr. David Kelly, the weapons expert who died in mysterious circumstances after the Iraq war, may have been about to reveal alarming details concerning missing nuclear weapons. Sources familiar with Dr Kelly’s work with South Africa’s security services say he also knew damaging details of how nuclear weapons decommissioned by South Africa were lost in the Middle East in 1991……..
Informed experts who have contacted the Sunday Express claim the missing nuclear weapons found their way to Iraq. The claims raise new questions about the extent of Dr Kelly’s knowledge of British security secrets, which some insiders believe may have contributed to his death. Some believe he may have been silenced to prevent him revealing more secrets to the media. The South African weapons allegedly went missing in Oman on their way to be decommissioned in the US and may have then been smuggled to Iraq. A source claimed: “Dr Kelly knew about the South African nukes because he worked for research facilities there.
Over the last year intelligence sources in both Britain and America have told journalists they believe that whatever Doomsday arsenal Saddam Hussein had accumulated before the second Gulf War was smuggled into Syria before the Spring 2003 invasion.
Last month the Sunday Express revealed that MI5 investigators looking for details of Dr Kelly’s involvement with the South African government, seized his laptop computers after he died. The coroner charged with investigating the Government scientist’s death has said he will not reopen the case.”
While British and American troops stormed across Iraq in 2003, searching for these missing nukes, defense experts now fear they had been in Israeli hands all along, a secret Dr. David Kelly was no longer willing to keep, one that led to his death. The missing containers may easily have been transferred to the Netherlands, Nigeria or even the United States, perhaps even Indiana or Toledo as is now rumored. British police have raided the homes of many involved in the missing weapons, seizing computers, personal papers and “frightening the hell out of people.” Some of those terrorized are scheduled witnesses for the Iraq War inquiry.
ONLY AMERICAN DEAD CAN PRE-STAGE THE IRAN ATTACK
This summer, Turkey and Brazil negotiated a deal with Iran to remove any nuclear fuel that could be used for weapons development. It was exactly what everyone had been asking for. President Obama ignored it and pushed for sanctions demanded by Israel. Russia cancelled the sale of an S300 air defense system to Iran and voted to back sanctions against its ally, Iran also. The relationship between Tel Aviv and the Russian oligarchs, seen so clearly during the Jonathan Pollard spy scandal, had reappeared for public again though no news organization picked any of this up.
With secret Israeli bases, believed used for transit of narcotics from Afghanistan, ringing Iran, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and other nations in the region, and US supplies and munitions in place or being delivered through Black Sea ports, only American public opinion is holding up an attack on Iran, despite the fact that Iran’s president Ahmadinejad has requested an immediate conference with President Obama to “settle outstanding issues.”
UPSTAGING 9/11
Even though Iran is isolated, even from its Islamic neighbors, it has a substantial defensive capability. Iran can quickly destroy all gulf region oil production facilities and close off shipping to that region, an act likely to collapse all western economies in days. Militarily, however, Iran is unable to defend itself against the vast technological superiority of the United States. However, after a decade of wars with Iraq remaining, not only unstable but increasingly so, and the United States facing defeat in Afghanistan, the American people are unlikely to want to begin a new conflict, especially with an adversary much more powerful than either Iraq and Afghanistan and Israel as the only ally, a country the United States has no mutual defense treaty with and no ability to sustain conflict beyond its own immediate borders for more than 48 hours.
Earlier this year, Israeli military historian Dr. Martin Van Creveld announced Israel’s “King Torah” policy toward the “gentile nations:”
“We have hundreds of nuclear warheads and missiles that can reach different targets in the heart of the European continent, including beyond the borders of Rome, the Italian capital…most European capitals would become preferred targets for the Israeli air force.”
The legal justification for a nuclear attack is in place, part of Israeli law. The will to do so is there if such an attack can be pulled off and few doubt Israel’s ability who have seen the power of the Israeli lobby in Washington and have spoken of their control of the press, such as with the recent media castration of director Oliver Stone.
The tools are in place. Israel is believed to possess two Hiroshima sized nuclear weapons, weapons that can be used freely because the media is ready to claim them to be “stolen” by Muslims if told to do so. The third weapon was exploded by North Korea with the media blackout leaving Israel as the only possible source for this weapon. No nation has the power to black out a leak like that one, not a leak that exposes Israel as a rogue arms dealer, first to apartheid South Africa, then Libya and both Iraq and Iran during their war and finally North Korea.
The ground is prepared, America is now stripped of “forensic” ability to track nuclear explosions, so the cover story tells us. Israel still threatens the world with the missing nukes, weapons reason tells us they control. Any container in any port, any truck, any warehouse could hide these weapons, anywhere in the United States.
When it happens, the vast majority of Americans will find the trail left, Pakistanis, Iranians, all as planned. They will immediately call for the destruction of the Islamic world as is intended by Israel. The internet will be shut down, congress sent home and anyone mentioning that only Israel profits and that only Israel could have done it will be imprisoned, as intended.
They learned from 9/11. Too many questions were asked. They won’t make the same mistake again.
America’s man with a plan for IranThe highest-ranking US military officer says America has a plan for thwarting Iran’s nuclear ambitions, while admitting that such a strike would “endanger the security of the region.”
Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, turned up the temperature in the Middle East several degrees when he told a US news program that America has a military plan for engaging Iran, while adding that he hoped “we don’t get to that.”
Mullen was asked by NBC’s “Meet the Press” if the US military has a devised plan for confronting Iran over its alleged nuclear weapon’s program. “We do,” Mullen replied. Yet Washington’s leading military adviser held out strong reservations over implementing such a move: “I hope we don’t get to that, but it’s an important option and it’s one that’s well understood.”
Previously, it had been standard protocol for US military leaders to only hint at the possibility of a full-blown attack, stating diplomatically for example that “all the options are on the table,” rather specifically mentioning the last-resort military option.
Explicitly mentioning a military response to Iran’s ongoing nuclear program, which Tehran claims is solely for civilian energy purposes, falls short of Obama’s noble pledge to “sit down and talk” with America’s enemies, as opposed to relying on the last-resort option of military action that largely defined the Bush years.
As things now stand, the world continues to hold its breath, hoping the latest round of economic sanctions against Iran will compel the Islamic Republic to fully co-operate with the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA).
In June, the United Nations imposed the harshest round of sanctions on Iran yet, targeting Iranian banks and export businesses; the EU and the United States unilaterally moved to block oil and gas investment in the country. But Iran shows no sign of backing down.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has gone on record as saying the latest round of economic sanctions will have no effect on Iran, as it is his country’s “right to pursue renewable technologies, like other nations in the world.”
Yet, as the Russian president confirmed recently, Iran is not simply interested in the energy needs of its population.
Last month, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned the world that Iran is “moving closer” to having the potential to create nuclear weapons.
“Iran is moving closer to possessing the potential which in principle could be used for the creation of nuclear weapons,” President Medvedev told a meeting of ambassadors in Moscow.
What price military action?
Commencing a military operation against Iran would open a hornets’ nest of grave problems in the Middle East, as Admiral Mullen was quick to mention.
Without elaborating on the details of the plan, Mullen warned that such an attack would have “unintended consequences that are difficult to predict in what is an incredibly unstable part of the world.”
This was not the first time that Obama’s leading military advisor provided slightly ambiguous comments as to how America would respond to the threat of Iran possibly joining the nuclear club.
In February, during a news conference at the US Embassy in Tel Aviv, Mullen said he was opposed to Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons, while repeating his warning of the “unintended consequences” of a military strike.
“From a policy standpoint, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, [or] nuclear capability,” Mullen said, before adding a significant caveat: “I’ve also been clear, them getting a weapon and/or the outbreak of a conflict would be a big, big problem for all of us. And I worry a great deal about the unintended consequences of a strike that are pretty hard to be specific about, in a pretty volatile region that’s pretty hard to predict.”
Indeed, even the suggestion of a military attack was greeted in Tehran with hostility and saber-rattling.
“If the Americans make the slightest mistake, the security of the region will be endangered. Security in the Persian Gulf should be for all or none,” Yadollah Javani, the deputy head of the elite Revolutionary Guards, told the official IRNA news agency on Sunday.
“The Persian Gulf is a strategic region and if it is endangered they (Americans) will suffer losses and our response will be firm,” Javani added. “We will defend ourselves if America or Israel resort to any hostile measures against our vital values.”
Also on Sunday, Iran’s envoy to the United Nations warned that the Islamic Republic would set Tel Aviv ablaze if Israel attacks it.
“If the Zionist regime commits the slightest aggression against Iranian soil, we will set the entire war front and Tel Aviv on fire,” Mohammad Khazai said, as quoted by Kashmar, the Farhang-e Ashti daily.
Meanwhile, Iranian President Ahmadinejad made an impassioned plea to Barack Obama, challenging him on Monday to a televised debate to determine who has the best solutions for the world’s problems.
“Toward the end of summer we will hopefully be there for the (UN) General Assembly and I will be ready for one-on-one talks with Mr Obama, in front of the media of course,” Ahmadinejad told a conference of Iranian expatriates in Tehran. “We will offer our solutions for world issues to see whose solutions are better.”
The proposal by Ahmadinejad is an interesting one, especially since Barack Obama regularly pledged during his presidential campaign to “sit down and talk” with America’s enemies, as opposed to implementing the “option of last resort” more popular with the neocon hawks of the Bush presidency.
Yet in the unlikely event that such a debate would occur (which could possibly attract better television ratings than the World Cup), there are several nagging factors that Ahmadinejad would use to his possible advantage, including the assertion that Israel has a nuclear weapons capability.
Analysts are practically unanimous in the belief that Israel has no less than 200 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, including submarine-launched nuclear cruise missiles. Iran’s predictable counterargument is one commonly heard in any school playground: “why is he allowed to do that, but we are not?” A very simple question that has no simple answer, at least not one that will be acceptable to Tehran in any case.
Meanwhile, the Islamic Republic firmly believes, especially with the anticlimactic demise of Iraq next door, that it is an influential regional power that should not be restrained from developing its nuclear capabilities. After all, there are already nine nuclear powers on the planet, Tehran argues, including punchy Pakistan, which borders Iran in the southern part of the country.
In light of these and other factors, which place Washington in an extremely awkward position when it comes to lecturing Iran about its own nuclear developments, it is more understandable why Obama has become the international spokesman for a “world without nuclear weapons.”
Such an ambitious platform, forwarded by none other than the Nobel Peace Prize winner, gives the United States more of an argument for discouraging other countries, including Iran, from letting the nuclear genie out of the bottle.
In other words, do as we say, not as we do. Whether the world will ever go “nuke-free,” well, that is an altogether different question.
So if – God forbid – the latest round of sanctions fail to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the decision to open yet another military front in the Middle East is decided, what can we expect?
Certainly nothing good, to say the least. First, it is doubtful that a full-blown military campaign will destroy all of Iran’s nuclear research facilities, while it would only intensify its quest for nuclear power.
“Even a successful military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities would delay Iran’s program by only a few years, and it would almost certainly harden Tehran’s determination to go nuclear,” wrote James A. Lindsay and Ray Takeyh in the March/April issue of Foreign Affairs political journal.
The authors then rather half-heartedly speculated that a military attack, or even the threat of one, could be enough to bring down the already wobbling regime of President Ahmadinejad: “The ongoing political unrest in Iran could topple the regime, leading to fundamental changes in Tehran’s foreign policy and ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. But that is an outcome that cannot be assumed.”
Finally, it needs to be remembered that the Iran of 2010 is not the Iraq of 2003: Iran possesses an impressive range of ground and air resources.
In a 2007 parade to commemorate the anniversary of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, Tehran put on display its Shahab 3 missile, saying it could travel 2,000 km – a range long enough to hit Israel and US bases in the region. Another missile, the Ghadr 1, can reach targets up to 1,800 km away. In November 2008, Iran said it had test-fired a Sejjil missile with a range of close to 2,000 km.
But a full-blown war in the Middle East would have repercussions not just for the immediate region, but for the entire planet. It does not take a very vivid imagination – considering the vast arsenal of weapons that such a military adventure would demand – to foresee the horrible environmental consequences that such a decision would inflict around the world. This underlines the paradox of modern military power: the more powerful the weapons of mass destruction become, the more national governments must restrain themselves from implementing their use unless they want to wish to wipe out all life as we know it.
In the end, either war will become extinct or mankind – it is as simple as that. The current debate on Iran will test mankind’s ability to use judgment in deciding which of the two evils is greater: allowing one’s avowed enemy to (possibly) arm himself with the deadliest weapons ever created, or unleash a war the likes of which the planet may never recover from. After all, Iran may cool its heels when (if) it ever acquires nuclear weapons. Or it may not. But the latter scenario would mean nothing less than national suicide, which not even Ahmadinejad would be willing to accept.
Fortunately, there is a third option: We can hope that the present sanctions against Iran will work to erode the power base of the present regime, thus paving the way for an Iranian leader the West can work with.
Ironically, the West had exactly that man with Mohammad Khatami, an Iranian scholar and liberal-minded politician who served as the fifth President of Iran from August 2, 1997 to August 3, 2005. Khatami was a peace-loving leader who pushed for a “Dialogue amongst Civilizations”. The United Nations declared the year 2001 as the Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations, on Khatami’s suggestion.
Since the United States must take a large part of the blame for the rise of Iran’s hawkish President Ahmadinejad, who rose to power on a wave of anti-American fervor following the very unpopular and very unnecessary War in Iraq, it seems that the United States must “sleep in the bed it made” and find the most peaceful and reasonable way of disarming Ahmadinejad.
In the end, it has to be a decision we can all live with.

22 comments:

  1. A nuclear or dirty bomb false flag is a very real possibility, no doubt to be followed by martial law. Note the spelling of "martial" law. The "Provost Marshall" is the chief military law enforcement officer on a military base, thus the confusion.
    The unauthorized transfer of nuclear weapons from Minot to Barksdale was an attempt at a false flag operation, probably by VP Dick Cheney. Some courageous Air Force officers blew the whistle and stopped it midway through. Later, over seventy Air Force personnel were punished for their part in the mishap. Seventy careers ruined means a REAL evil happened, not just an innocent mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lest anyone believe the Minot to Barksdale incident was a "mistake" consider the following. Seventy careers ruined means those officers should have said "no" but did not. One or two might have been negligent or incompetent, but seventy? With nuclear weapons, not just a few million dollars in cash. Not just classified information, the possible end of civilization. We all know how seriously the military takes even trivial regulations. Does anyone think even a General could have pulled this off by himself? No, it was higher. Maybe even Bush himself, but more likely Cheney. If it was Bush, he was trying to go outside regular channels, which is why he could be stopped. The officers who stopped him were able to demand that he go through channels, which probably includes the approval of senior military officers and notification of at least some civilian leaders (one hopes). The bad news is there were seventy officers willing to risk their careers rather than defy Bush or Cheney.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Two words, Samson Option. They behave like mad dogs so as to be left alone. I think it's too late to shut down the internet. The truth genie is already out of the bottle.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rogue nukes are very much the wild card in war gaming theory. The hard part in any simulated war game is to get one or more of the protagonists to cross the ‘nuclear threshold’. After that all options are really on the table.

    As a bonus they scare the sheep witless. Fear is the desired outcome as the herd will meekly do as they are told. This will prevent any organised resistance to the imposition of open fascism. We’re pretty much there already thanks to the US supreme(sic) court decision to turn the electoral process into a closed bidding system – eBay would be more honest.

    Buckle up folks as its going to get real interesting. How’s this for some interesting ‘fiction’ from a leading Murdock rag in CCTV land
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/4220575/Blackjack.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh Jeez chuckyman! Today is the 5th of November for cryin' out loud! That slideshow is the LAST thing I needed! I think I'll go watch V For Vendetta now. BTW, that avatar of yours kinda gives me the creeps.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LOL Saladin. The picture is sort of a cute, more credulous version of how I look – with more hair (grin).

    What can I say? I’m an unrepentant Irish Fenian and the last scene of that movie warms my cynical old heart. V for Vendetta is top of my favourite movie list. As you can guess – I would have been cheering Guy Fawkes on. My ancestors lost out on that one in ways you could not imagine.

    I hadn’t mentally made the 5th November link to my comment. Synchronicity maybe? The Universe sometimes drops really big hints.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well the forums are in overdrive tonight. All around the internet is a fury storm about a Simpsons cartoon reference to 11/6/10 the numerology inverted equaling 9/11/01, being a false flag event. Because of a parallel of the 1997 Simpson cartoon of Lisa predicting 9-11. This alone would not have people all up in arms but the simultaneous event of Obama taking an extended trip to India with not just his white house staff but his entire family and numerous friends estimated at well over 3000 people. Plus Obama brought with him 30+ Navy warships, Marines and 60+ high tech airplanes from the Air Force. For a friendly trip to India? If this wasent enough the Dollar is on verge to dramatically drop in value and Wallstreet is desperately trying to pump another 600 Billion into the Federal Reserve in hopes of staving off Disaster. If none of this has you at least wondering perhaps maybe this does. Half Past Human's has released a "Tipping point graph" similar to the one they release prior to 9-11 saying Internet parallels have concluded that an event is due next week that is on a stage larger than 9-11 and every terrorist attack ever combined.

    I personally do not think anything will happen next week, but I am also not taking any chances. I have gassed up my vehicle and packed up my camping gear, water and medical equipment into my van. This at the least very interesting and only time will tell... right?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Best to prepare for the worst and nothing happen then regret the lack of preparation. I have had the most awful sinking feeling for several months. I saw the graph you refer to a couple days ago, that didn't help. That we live in interesting times is without question, unfortunately it isn't positive interest.
    chuckyman, I know quite a lot about the history of Ireland, that it has been relentlessly beat down time and time again by one invader or another makes me completely empathetic with Guy Fawkes. People can only take so much abuse before they snap. I hope the people of America are reaching a snapping point too, otherwise we are doomed as a nation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Saladin, Like you and those who have commented above, my favorite movie is also "V for Vendetta." But where I differ from you guys is that I blog under my real name in the hope that my credentials increase my credibility when I post such hard to believe stuff as we all do.

    RE the Minot to Barksdale incident, I posted my own links to the event (some not found elsewhere) together with my original analysis of an almost certainly related event, the so-called "meteorite" strike in Peru. Find this story here:
    http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/2007/12/hidden-nuke-crashed-satellite.html

    If anyone is interested, my latest posts comprise videos and one long article by two of the prominent Missouri-school economists who "tell it like it is."
    http://impactglassman.blogspot.com

    I would be pleased and honored if you would add Cherche la Verite to your blog list.

    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  10. Saladin IS my real name. It is my maiden name and part of my hyphenated married name.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No disrespect intended. And what a famous name! Do you believe you are descended from the Sultan of Egypt?

    Apropos, of 12th century Palestine (and Persia), a dear friend of ours who spent time in Iran as a soldier and has deeply researched the military history of the period has written a splendid novel, Assassins of Alamut. You can find my review of it on Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/ASSASSINS-ALAMUT-Persia-Palestine-Crusades/dp/1935585398

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am not a descendant, the name is German but I'm not German either. My father was adopted by a German couple but he was a half-breed Cherokee. I'm just lucky to have received a name related to someone I consider to be a hero, that is why I blog with it. I've added your blog to my list, it is a good one. I'm happy to know you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm happy to know you too, Saladin -- and also to learn a bit about your genealogy. If you are on LinkedIn or ever decide to join, we could swap e-mail addresses there.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi there Mr Grey. I am glad that you shared your prescience (grin). I’m just back so I’ll pop over shortly.

    Sorry Saladin for not getting back to you. This world revolution and unveiling of the apocalypse is OK but some of us still have to put in new laminate flooring to keep our women folk happy :-(

    On your point of the repeated hammering of the oppressed I take heart that those who know tyranny will never bow to it. There have been so many lessons in my own people’s past and currently in the heart breaking suffering of the Palestinians.

    Right and wrong are constants (despite what we are told) and a community that shares a deep common bond can withstand anything. I have admired one man above others and he truly showed by example the motto that ‘greater love has no man than to lay down his life for another’.

    Bobby is quoted as saying that “it is not those who can inflict the most but those who can endure the most shall win”. The Irish, the Vietnamese, the Algerians, the Basques, the Iraqis and the Afghans and all the others prove that time and again.

    Those that seek to impose themselves on us always bugger it up. In 1916 the Irish Rebellion failed miserably. The Brits had sailed battleships up the local estuary and shelled rebel positions – much like the US military would do. The surrendered rebels were marched through the street to their doom and the Dublin people spat on them (not unsurprisingly).

    The Brits decided to execute the rebels over a long drawn-out period – to set an example. The revulsion of the population set in motion a cataclysm that swept most of the old order away.

    What I’m trying to say is that there is no resistance without a price but that it can spring forth from the most unlikely of sources. Many online dismiss the ‘herd’. My own discussions tell me that this is a fire awaiting a spark.

    I don’t wish this to happen – I’ve no need to see it again. That doesn’t mean that we meekly go into yonder fair night. The real work will be to ensure that when the spark happens – the herd does not follow the pre-planned script and blame the usual patsies.

    ReplyDelete
  15. My friend, I come from similar stock, the Trail Of Tears is well known and I somehow feel it in my bones, even though, as part Cherokee, it is far removed from me. Oppression seems to be the human condition, I don't really understand why, but I do know we fight it generation after generation. I am honored that you remember to come back to comment on my erstwhile blog, it is certainly a voice in the wilderness, as I have named it, but I know kindred souls, I have seen you about in the web and know a like spirit when I see one. We are connected and may have always been. I have felt this before. We are going to win.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thank you Saladin. There is much more that binds us all together than we realise. The few that divide us so that they may rule have had their time. That time is now at an end. We will see a better day but it will not be like it has been.

    As the Sioux would say - Hoka Hey

    ReplyDelete
  17. In the words of the Hopi elders, "We are the ones we've been waiting for."

    I'm in solidarity with you both.

    ReplyDelete
  18. like what you wrote, I believe you also like what I would recommend.someday,i find my favoraite shop,in this shop, you can find huge selection ofYour blog is so informative ? keep up the good work!!!!amliya handbags

    ReplyDelete
  19. 651. Terror case around 10/27 (11/2/2010)

    My wife was arranged an unusual Chinese trip from 10/17 to 10/27. If a framed drug case broke out at this time, big events would be created to distract public attention. Either there would be natural disasters (artificial), or terror attacks, or the war on Iran, or all of them. A typical one was the plot of April 8, 2009. My wife, severely sickened with flu, returned from her China trip on that day. Around 4/8/2010, there was a pandemic took place in Mexico that killed 168 people in that month. Later, government said that was a new flu and gave it a new name - Swine flu. I had accurately predicted that event in "596. Bio-attack in the name of pandemic (3/30/09)".

    This time the big event was terror attack. On 10/29, media made it a big news that two mail bombs from Yemen were found on separate cargo planes. The information was delivered by Saudi-Arabia security to US on 10/28. I think if Feds had activated the framed drug case on 10/27, next day there would be a series of terror bombings in US and Europe. That could have developed to a nuclear attack. People could see it from their pre-psychological propaganda.

    Re: "10/10/21 Clinton Lost Nuclear 'Biscuit'

    Published October 21, 2010
    FoxNews

    At the time, Patterson described how Clinton misplaced the card for months, confessing the loss after being asked to provide the card so it could be replaced with an updated code.

    ABC noted that a similar claim was made about former President Jimmy Carter, who was said to have left the card with the launch codes in a suit sent to the dry cleaner.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/21/report-clinton-lost-nuclear-biscuit/ "

    Quote, "Oops! US Air Force loses 50 nukes

    Published 28 October, 2010

    US military lost track of 50 intercontinental ballistic missiles recently. The incident became public after a former Air Force officer tweeted about the loss of communication between the missiles and the control center.

    http://rt.com/Top_News/2010-10-28/usa-lost-nukes-missiles.html "

    Clinton time is a decade away. Carter time is much older. Why would they beat a dead horse? It's similar to the recent attack on Roman Catholic with decades old sex abusing cases. There is a purpose behind it. Did other presidents of US have committed similar negligence? Why Clinton and Carter were picked up? It's because they are in same party with current president - Obama. To make it easy for people to believe Demo-controlled government is negligent in security. These events are used to justify a coming nuclear terror attack. The two news within a week is not a coincidence. It opens a passage of nuclear attack when the low end gate (operation) of air force and the high end gate (command) of President are both opening.

    These bombing attack news and nuclear negligence news were all released at a time around 10/27.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 652. Another plot of nuclear attack (11/11/2010)

    I allege Feds planned a nuclear attack on US in later October. If you remember, there was an attempt of similar attack on August 30, 2007 when a B-52 carried 6 loaded nuclear missile flied over US continent.
    On August 28, 2007, media reported that Bush accepted the resignation of Attorney General Gonzales. His top adviser - Karl Rove also left his post on August 30. The news told us that the rat always is the first to learn the ship would sink. And this time, we got:

    Quote, "EXODUS OF JEWISH ADVISORS FROM OBAMA WHITE HOUSE:
    by arminius33 ? Mon Oct 11, 2010

    What makes this latest development all the more ominous is that Emmanuel is not the only VIP within organized Zionist interests getting our of Dodge. Shortly after Emmanuel's announcement, the political world was rocked with the news literally within days of each others that Emmanuel's colleagues, namely David Axelrod (Obama's Chief Political Advisor) and Larry Summers (Chief Economic Advisor) announced they were leaving as well.

    http://www.itszone.co.uk/discuss/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=114132

    Emmanuel left for no convincible reason. He just cut off the relationship to a criminal nuclear attack like what Karl Rove and Gonzales had done.

    Another man had predicted this terror attack.

    Quote, "Alex Jones Predicts Staged Terror Attack in October-November 2010

    We have Obama and Clinton advisers saying, "What Obama needs is a giant terror attack to win the mid term elections and to get a second term in 2012'.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHggwnUOHjA&feature=player_embedded#!

    It means the Obama administration approved the plot for the interest of their party. The plot went soured when they failed to frame me into a drug case.

    On 11/2 I wrote "651. Terror case around 10/27 (11/2/2010)". Next day afternoon something strange happened while I logged into E-Bay's forum. I found I could post everything except #651. Then I was blocked to post in the internet. Next day (11/4) the problem continued. I went to library. There in Chinese newspaper "World Journal" there was an article about "Asian Carp". It said the authority changed their policy - they will kill and eat the Asian Carp instead of intercept them. It was obviously an intimidation. #651 revealed their plot. Feds are so angry that they decide to kill and eat me. How to kill and eat? I don't know. But it proves I am very correct on their mafia style communication. see "642. Next step, a Chinese spy ring? (8/2/2010) ".

    ReplyDelete
  21. 653. Target of nuclear attack - AE911 TRUTH (11/18/2010)

    There was a missile launch on Nov.8 off California coast.
    [quote], "Mystery Rocket Launch Caught On Camera Off California Coast - Expert Interviewed

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5pnAFducY "[/quote]

    The odd thing is Pentagon denied it knew there was a rocket launching. I allege it was part of "later October plot". Either it was a practice of the plot or a signal to the counterpart of the Feds - the rogue teams of secret police of other joined countries, among them U.K. and China are sure conspirators. It convinces them that the Feds did have prepared a nuclear attack on US.

    One thing should be noticed is that there were multiple targets Feds planned to attack. In Aug. 30, 2007, six nuclear missiles were loaded on B-52. In this later October plot, 50 intercontinental ballistic missiles lost track. In "511. Seven most wanted cities by Feds (9/28/2007)" I said that Washington DC, Boston and Houston were the possible targets. In this plot, I add two more cities: New York and San Francisco. The reason: there are people live there Whom Feds fear so much.

    For many times, I said that Feds planned framed drug case on me with big events to distract. So many times their plans didn't go through because they failed to frame me in drug case. Iran war delayed again and again because for Feds, Iran war is less important then a witness to their crime. Two months ago, another big threat appeared.

    [quote] Evidence Refutes the Official 9/11 Investigation: The Scientific Forensic Facts


    by Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts
    Global Research, October 13, 2010
    Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - 2010-10-04

    AE911Truth Delivers the Evidence to the Media: Press Conference - National Press Club – Washington DC

    Ed. – This is the actual 10-minute statement read by Richard Gage, AIA, to the media at the AE911Truth press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC on September 9, 2010.
    Good afternoon, my name is Richard Gage, AIA. I am a member of the American Institute of Architects; I have been a licensed architect for 22 years; And I am the founder of the non-profit organization, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth).

    As a group, we now have more than 1,270 architect and engineer petition signers. Collectively, we have more than 25,000 years of building and technical experience. This press conference is being given by our petition signers and supporters today in 65 [it turned out to be 67] locations around the world, including 30 states and 4 countries.

    Today, we are here to inform you that we have uncovered evidence that the official investigations into what happened to the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 were deeply flawed, or worse. The scientific forensic facts we have discovered have very troubling implications.

    ........ See detail at


    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=21436 [/quote]

    "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" is a professional group. The evidence they gave is a fatal to the Feds. AE911 TRUCE press conference to media on 9/9/2010 must have rattled the Feds. I think it motivated the Feds again to activate the second nuclear attack in later October. To eliminate individual, Feds could frame a drug case. How can they eliminate a group? There are hundreds of them. One easy way (for the Feds) is: a nuclear attack.

    The home base of AE911 TRUTH is in San Francisco (Berkeley?), that's why I think it becomes a target. The other one is the New York City.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 654. A 90 days' project (11/30/2010)

    The 10/27/2010 plot went soured. For which Feds created UPS mail bomb case. The plot ends with BBC's announcement.

    UPS Yemen Bomb Scare is a Hoax BBC Confirms NO Explosives
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNXb9NWPtcw&sns


    [quote]
    Obama lies about the Bomb at Midlands UK airport, BBC don't even try to hide it. As the producer in V for Vendetta says "It's not our job to make up the news, that's the governments"

    The FAKE bomb attack comes 4 days before the Midterms, and 3 days after British Airways said security was to tight and that naked body scanners were too intrusive, how convenient for those America scanner makers that this story would break. [/quote]

    Anyhow, a new 90 days project is set up immediately. Here is a strange news.


    "Israel's Netanyahu unveils U.S. plan for new talks

    By Allyn Fisher-Ilan Allyn Fisher-ilan – Sat Nov 13,

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101113/ts_nm/us_palestinians_israel_talks"

    The US has given Israel a written guarantee that it won't pressure the Jewish state for additional settlement freezes if it accepts a limited 90 day construction moratorium to revive Mideast peace talks.

    My interpretation of this news is: US covertly promised Israel to activate the war on Iran in exchange for a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine . For years the promise was broken again and again. Isarel. loses patience and starts its settlement construction in Palestinian's land. This time, to assure Israel, Feds gave Israel a written paper to guarantee a war.

    On 11/8, a mystery missile launched off California coach. I now think it was a signal to the rogue team of the counterpart of the Feds in collaborate countries. It indicates that the Feds determined to activate a nuclear attack.

    [quote] GORDON DUFF: IN MOTION: THE PLOT TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES
    November 11, 2010 posted by Gordon Duff

    SEE IT COMING AND STOP IT, EVEN IF IT COSTS YOU EVERYTHING
    By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

    “The 2010 election had one purpose, war with Iran, even if the risk is world conflict and the real loser, no matter what happens on the battlefield is the United States.”

    Plans are in motion for a “false flag” attack on America. Iran will be blamed, everyone knows that and Iran will be totally innocent. This is the last thing Iran would ever want. The most likely scenario is a nuclear attack. Two bombs are missing, bombs built by Israel in South Africa and lost long ago. These were supposedly Saddam’s bombs. Now we are told Iran has them. Israel has had them all along and the fear, they may be inside the United States already.
    ..........

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/11/gordon-duff-in-motion-the-plot-to-destroy-the-united-states/

    [/quote]

    ReplyDelete