S 510 and C -36, in removing adequate supplementation, would remove access to intravenous vitamin C, increasingly recognized as an effective therapy for cancers and many other deadly diseases.
NIH confirms its efficacy, something Linus Pauling attempted to share with the world decades ago and for which he was attacked, rather than lionized.
"We found 3 well-documented cases of advanced cancers, confirmed by histopathologic review, where patients had unexpectedly long survival times after receiving high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy. We examined clinical details of each case in accordance with National Cancer Institute (NCI) Best Case Series guidelines. Tumour pathology was verified by pathologists at the NCI who were unaware of diagnosis or treatment. In light of recent clinical pharmacokinetic findings and in vitro evidence of anti-tumour mechanisms, these case reports indicate that the role of high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy in cancer treatment should be reassessed." [Emphasis added.]
Why has the government been mute about this cheap, gentle, effective treatment for cancers?
How does it work?
All diseases, infections, toxins and viruses cause illness by
Even prior to "food safety" bills which the FDA could use to remove access to nutritional supplements, the FDA has been working to remove information about scientific value of supplements, threatening health stores and websites that they may not even mention the word "flu" or "H1N1" in advising customers about what products may be helpful.
And the AMA has arranged medical coding so doctors could not use supplements as therapies for diseases, no matter how confirmed in studies, with out potentially facing prison.